pardus
Verified Military
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 10,534
President Vladimir Putin amended the legislation on calling up reservists to include men convicted of serious crimes who recently left prison.
Former prisoners convicted of sex crimes against children or terrorism are still excluded from serving.
I remain glad to see that a people are actually willing to fight for their own country for a change, instead of expecting us to do it for them.All information and video/lessons are important.
However, I am having a real hard time with the ‘this is the future of warfare; we need to pay attention before we are in a conflict like this’ narrative.
My stance on Russia is known. If not for our $11B (or whatever the fr*ck it is now) in funding and weapons and foreign fighters, Ukraine would be speaking Russian.
No one can do basic tactics- like infantry + armor. There‘s no effective stand-off weapons, no air, no naval fires or indirect. No one has anti-drone tech. No one has an IC infrastructure capable of war fighting functions and exquisite capability.
It’s like an NFL team watching a Pop Warner game and wringing their hands in dismay about what happens if they ever have to play one another. It’s insane.
DM me for the super inappropriate analogy I was gonna make instead of the above football analogy.
I agree here. People (non-specific) are mistaking bravery and a fighting spirit for tactical prowess, I think. I value patriotism and nationalism, resistance to tyranny, and the moral and physical courage it takes to engage in that fight.I remain glad to see that a people are actually willing to fight for their own country for a change, instead of expecting us to do it for them.
… No one has anti-drone tech.
@Gordus - we are speaking from different optics here. You’re googling; I’m speaking from experience. Not a shot at you, but an objective observation. And you’re talking about ‘possibly getting it’ or ‘almost having it’. That means ‘they don’t have it’.
They have it ‘in some capacity’. In comparison to ours- it’s woefully underdeveloped or not present at all, and if it is, it’s not being employed effectively.
All information and video/lessons are important.
However, I am having a real hard time with the ‘this is the future of warfare; we need to pay attention before we are in a conflict like this’ narrative.
My stance on Russia is known. If not for our $11B (or whatever the fr*ck it is now) in funding and weapons and foreign fighters, Ukraine would be speaking Russian.
No one can do basic tactics- like infantry + armor. There‘s no effective stand-off weapons, no air, no naval fires or indirect. No one has anti-drone tech. No one has an IC infrastructure capable of war fighting functions and exquisite capability.
It’s like an NFL team watching a Pop Warner game and wringing their hands in dismay about what happens if they ever have to play one another. It’s insane.
DM me for the super inappropriate analogy I was gonna make instead of the above football analogy.
I don't know where you are getting your intel from, but it's not accurate.I agree here. People (non-specific) are mistaking bravery and a fighting spirit for tactical prowess, I think. I value patriotism and nationalism, resistance to tyranny, and the moral and physical courage it takes to engage in that fight.
I think two things can be true at the same time- I respect the individuals fighting and dying as citizens of Ukraine (my thoughts on foreign fighters is a bit different) in this war; I also don’t think the Russians or Ukraine are true ‘peers’ in any sense.
I respect the intent. As a practical evaluation of tactics and war fighting capability from both sides… lacking.
Imagine the 82nd airborne replacing the Ukrainians. Or the Batts. Or any SOF.
*Biden Voice* C’mon, man!
do you even know one US military member who has been under sustained artillery fire?