The one guy that claims to have served with the now former Commander posted his "name".And yes FF, I believe the internet comment section is the worst invention ever.... go back to the old school letters to the editor, where you had to put your name on opinion.
The one guy that claims to have served with the now former Commander posted his "name".
The three top leaders of the guided missile destroyer USS James E. Williams (DDG-95) have been removed and reassigned halfway through the ship's deployment pending the outcome of an investigation into "command climate," the Navy said in a news release Tuesday.
The skipper, Cmdr. Curtis B. Calloway, was relieved at sea by Capt. Anthony L. Simmons, who will take charge of the ship for the rest of the deployment as an investigation moves forward. Calloway, along with Cmdr. Ed Handley, the executive officer, and Command Master Chief Travis Biswell, the top enlisted leader, have been reassigned to staff positions at Naval Surface Force Atlantic.
Other than announcing the high-profile firings and mentioning an investigation, the official word from the Navy offered few details. But as Sam LaGrone notes at the U.S. Naval Institute, the removal of the entire command staff at the same time is quite rare.
The Navy Times offered one possibility as to why:
A Navy official who spoke on background to discuss a sensitive matter said there is a separate investigation being conducted by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service into a liberty incident that occurred in the Sixth Fleet area of operations, but declined to divulge further details.
The Williams left its home port in Norfolk, Virginia, on May 30 for an eight-month deployment in support of U.S. Africa Command.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/relief-uss-james-williams-2014-9#ixzz3Daupwpxn
Jesus, must have been something big for the entire Triad to be reassigned mid-deployment.
I wonder if it has anything to do with drugs by the ton AND more than one dead hooker in a bathtub?
Was he the previous XO?http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Captain-of-USS-Boxer-Relieved-of-Duty-277631221.html
Only 3 months as CO. My guess is something came up on a CMEO survey that may be tied to the previous CO...or something to that effect.
Yes sir, previous XO. That leads me to believe 1 of 2 things happened.Was he the previous XO?
The link you posted said "In a news release, the Navy did not explain why Brown was fired, but cited “equal opportunity concerns…not tied to a specific event.”
Which makes me believe he favored certain individuals.
The new guy taking the hit generally doesn't happen unless he was part of the problem as XO.Yes sir, previous XO. That leads me to believe 1 of 2 things happened.
1) The situation you described where he was showing favoritism as XO, he fleets up to CO, a CMEO survey is done as a result of the change of command and the sailors nail him hard.
2) A CMEO survey was done just before the change of command and the results came out with the new CO taking the brunt of the results.
Makes sense.
I'd really like to know what happens to all these Commanding Officers who are reassigned (to pretty decent commands) while the "investigation is pending".
They are dumped to a staff until the investigation is complete. While I can't find any conclusive evidence, I did notice most of the names in this thread already had LinkedIn pages which if I took the time to view them would probably illuminate their current place in society. My guess is they quietly retired if they had their 20, but many of them were commissioned in 96 or so. Unless they were prior enlisted they don't have their 20.
I had a resume cross my desk years ago. An enlisted sailor, something about it seemed off so I Googled his name. While I couldn't prove his work history was false, even though it didn't seem right, I could point to the DUI or DUI manslaughter case in Japan he walked away from. He wasn't hired, but no one in HR had taken the time to use the Net either... So, you'd like to think the guys and gals in this thread are homeless because of their actions, but the reality is some companies won't care and some won't even bother to do a basic amount of background on their new hire.