The Trump Presidency 2.0

[RackMaster]

ha - we got the email about 'Signal' having holes in it days ago.
...look over there, its a shiny thing

**POOF**

I wonder if this was done on purpose to burn Signal use down for everyone.

Unless the device your using has built in crypto or a connected crypto device, plus all end users have the same equipment. Nothing is secure and that's been proven numerous times.

I didn't go into this to deep, don't want to. Did the reporter ever make an effort to contact anyone in that chat or anyone from the administration before publishing?

 

[Cookie_]

I wonder if this was done on purpose to burn Signal use down for everyone.

Unless the device your using has built in crypto or a connected crypto device, plus all end users have the same equipment. Nothing is secure and that's been proven numerous times.

I didn't go into this to deep, don't want to. Did the reporter ever make an effort to contact anyone in that chat or anyone from the administration before publishing?

The reporter messaged the National Security Advisor through signal directly, then him and all other parties via email/offical communications prior to publication of the article.

The NSC responded before publication to say (paraphrasing) "it looks authentic and we'll investigate how someone was added".

 

[RackMaster]

The reporter messaged the National Security Advisor through signal directly, then him and all other parties via email/offical communications prior to publication of the article.

The NSC responded before publication to say (paraphrasing) "it looks authentic and we'll investigate how someone was added".

Thanks.

 

[Topkick]

I pour "whataboutism" all over my pancakes...
...I sweeten my coffee with it

I've said similar things many times on here about whataboutism. I think it matters. Not necessarily on this board, but I've noticed a lot of those outraged about whataboutism are the first to go all whataboutism.

 

[amlove21]

I wonder if this was done on purpose to burn Signal use down for everyone.

Unless the device your using has built in crypto or a connected crypto device, plus all end users have the same equipment. Nothing is secure and that's been proven numerous times.

I didn't go into this to deep, don't want to. Did the reporter ever make an effort to contact anyone in that chat or anyone from the administration before publishing?

Nope!

And (I haven’t addressed any of the background info yet cause it’ll come out) don’t start noticing. Bad Rack.

The string wasn’t a work, they accidentally added an anti-Trump reporter because stupid, the responses definitely weren’t scripted, and the highest level of government often has open debate over a strike that was already approved via text. The NSC already said it was verified, and they’re a government agency full of experts. We already know everything about this.

First 20:00. Trump Admin Accidentally LEAKED War Plans To Liberal Journalist, But It May Be HOAX w/ Bradley Devlin

 

[amlove21]

In the interest of dogpiling and chewing gum and walking- this is a disgusting pick for CDC. Her record is awful, her quotes are worse.

I don’t often do this, but I’m giving this one a -3.

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[amlove21]

And here is a super fun story that I couldn't care less about. There are about 700 reasons to dislike Jasmine Crockett, possibly the dumbest elected official we have. This story is a nothing burger and does not matter. I don't get mad when Jasmine Crockett says dumb things in the same way as I don't get mad at dogs for barking. Dogs bark. Stupid people say stupid things.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/worl...ot-wheels-internet-fumes-101742915252091.html

 

[amlove21]

Russian operative and DNI Tulsi verifies the chat was real, she was on it, no OPSEC shared.

Gabbard says no classified info revealed on group chat of top intel officials, in Senate grilling

 

[AWP]

Russian operative and DNI Tulsi verifies the chat was real, she was on it, no OPSEC shared.

Gabbard says no classified info revealed on group chat of top intel officials, in Senate grilling

So the strike details as reported aren't classified? Now Air Tasking Orders are unclass?

We've both seen dozens if not hundreds of ATOs. I can never recall one being unclassified. The details alleged in the chat absolutely have to be classified because they always were going back to my time supporting the air war in 2004; 2025 is different? Timing, aircraft, munitions...that isn't OPSEC? Pure bullshit.

Nothing will come of this but anyone accepting this argument is kind of retarded. I have never seen an unclassified ATO in CENTCOM/ AFCENT, but now they are okay? No fucking way, Tulsi, not unless someone declassified it after the fact.

 

[Box]

So wait - am I to understand that some of the same folks that don't want to make the Epstein client list public because 'muh national security also want us to make group chats public so we can ALL read chat logs that may or may not be compromising 'muh national security
...I feel like this is either a joke, or an example of congressionally endorsed whataboutism

Either way - fuck it - I'm in - lets see it ALL - release the unredacted signal chat texts with the unredacted Epstein client list

I.AM.OUTRAGED.

 

[amlove21]

So the strike details as reported aren't classified? Now Air Tasking Orders are unclass?

We've both seen dozens if not hundreds of ATOs. I can never recall one being unclassified. The details alleged in the chat absolutely have to be classified because they always were going back to my time supporting the air war in 2004; 2025 is different? Timing, aircraft, munitions...that isn't OPSEC? Pure bullshit.

Nothing will come of this but anyone accepting this argument is kind of retarded. I have never seen an unclassified ATO in CENTCOM/ AFCENT, but now they are okay? No fucking way, Tulsi, not unless someone declassified it after the fact.

Gotta talk to her about it bro, I didn't make the claim, I wasn't there, and I won't defend something that was said if those first two gates aren't met.

 

[amlove21]

So wait - am I to understand that some of the same folks that don't want to make the Epstein client list public because 'muh national security also want us to make group chats public so we can ALL read chat logs that may or may not be compromising 'muh national security
...I feel like this is either a joke, or an example of congressionally endorsed whataboutism

Either way - fuck it - I'm in - lets see it ALL - release the unredacted signal chat texts with the unredacted Epstein client list

I.AM.OUTRAGED.

STOP NOTICING. It'll get you in trouble.

 

[AWP]

Gotta talk to her about it bro, I didn't make the claim, I wasn't there, and I won't defend something that was said if those first two gates aren't met.

100% onboard with this take.

My energetic pushback throughout this story is to drive home the point that this was wrong. Illegal. Anyone supporting it or spinning it is accepting and supporting of multiple felonies. The same as Hillary. The same as Biden's corvette. The same as that clown with "docs in socks." (Suess was born too early for that one) We put politicians and political parties on pedestals and then they remind us they have different rules than us peasants.

We need to stop worshiping these people and their groups. "My guy" is a fucking turd, the same as "their guy."

You mentioned how people won't do anything. I'll put my money where my mouth is. Within 7 days I will post my email to the elected officials (US Rep. and Senators) of where I live. I challenge other members to do the same. The crickets will be deafening.

 

[Grunt]

So the strike details as reported aren't classified? Now Air Tasking Orders are unclass?

We've both seen dozens if not hundreds of ATOs. I can never recall one being unclassified. The details alleged in the chat absolutely have to be classified because they always were going back to my time supporting the air war in 2004; 2025 is different? Timing, aircraft, munitions...that isn't OPSEC? Pure bullshit.

Nothing will come of this but anyone accepting this argument is kind of retarded. I have never seen an unclassified ATO in CENTCOM/ AFCENT, but now they are okay? No fucking way, Tulsi, not unless someone declassified it after the fact.

Much of the "masses" sincerely don't have a clue as to what's classified or not. I truly believe the news cycle is catering to them rather than those of us who have a clue. Nonetheless, it's embarrassing...

 

[AWP]

Since some of you may not know me, if anyone needs to me to establish my bonafides, LFG. I was the cybersecurity guy (ISSO) for AFCENT's C2 node for 5 years.

 

[amlove21]

100% onboard with this take.

My energetic pushback throughout this story is to drive home the point that this was wrong. Illegal. Anyone supporting it or spinning it is accepting and supporting of multiple felonies. The same as Hillary. The same as Biden's corvette. The same as that clown with "docs in socks." (Suess was born to early for that one) We put politicians and political on pedestals and then they remind us they have different rules than us peasants.

We need to stop worshiping these people and their groups. "My guy" is a fucking turd, the same as "their guy."

You mentioned how people won't do anything. I'll put my money where my mouth is. Within 7 days I will post my email to the elected officials (US Rep. and Senators) of where I live. I challenge other members to do the same. The crickets will be deafening.

Illegal! Can't use that word, cancelled. There are no illegal group chats, man. They're just group chats trying to do their best. In this case, these undocumented group chats are bombing Yemen.

 

[Cookie_]

Now I'm not a journalist who might need to maintain decorum; I'm just a smartass who likes to play chicken when given the chance.

If the offical response from DNI/SECDEF/WH is that there was nothing classified in the chats, Goldberg should go ahead and publish them.

Hell, he can even redact out the units/munitions/times/targets if he wants; publish them.

 

[AWP]

Illegal! Can't use that word, cancelled. There are no illegal group chats, man. They're just group chats trying to do their best. In this case, these undocumented group chats are bombing Yemen.

They are out there living their best lives. I guess if we can accept "body positivity" until Ozempic is available to the masses we should accept "information positivity" until better encryption is available?

Fuck it, I'm in.

 

[Grunt]

They are out there living their best lives. I guess if we can accept "body positivity" until Ozempic is available to the masses we should accept "information positivity" until better encryption is available?

Fuck it, I'm in.

Get you some of that bitter tasting blue pill my friend...

 

[amlove21]

They are out there living their best lives. I guess if we can accept "body positivity" until Ozempic is available to the masses we should accept "information positivity" until better encryption is available?

Fuck it, I'm in.

lol. I would like to see some other form of weight loss in regards to those chats, if the initial reporting holds up. In the form of an immediate 200lb hole in the position they previously occupied.