Topkick
Verified Military
And I actually had to consider it for a second...That's funny - I don't care who you are.
And I actually had to consider it for a second...That's funny - I don't care who you are.
You mean, we're supposed to be sober?Dems on FOX just asked if Hegseth was drunk texting.
You mean, we're supposed to be sober?
Mannnnnn I didn’t even want to get into this.
Let’s say you’re deployed to Africa. Let’s say you’re doing FID and some other things, and the only way you contact your partner forces through WhatsApp. They don’t have or use anything else and they also don’t know what the crap OPSEC is. So you end up on about 200 WhatsApp chains on your personal phone (because the command in its infinite wisdom didn’t get burners for you), and a lot of the information on there is at least sensitive.
Oh I forgot to mention that for all your ‘encryption’ and double speak and tradecraft none of that matters because the entire architecture you’re talking on is Chinese owned and operated because they own the cell service in Africa.
Now pretend all the teams do that in every country in Africa in every command to this day. Every flight schedule every show time every team engagement.
And it all flows through a single point- China- and out into the world.
Anyway here’s wonderwall.
“Mistakes happen they’ve been counseled moving on.”
You don’t even need 2 phones anymore, @Marauder06 . I had a ‘work phone’ for most of my career, and even the 2 shop would tell you it’s as secure as the network you’re talking on.
All that talk about WICKR earlier- secure messaging approved by AFSOC, on your personal phone, on a network owned by China.
I want to make this super clear- in no way am I using the argument “This happens all the time”. That’s a dumb reductive argument. But I am also not looking at this situation as if it exists in a silo completely and totally separate from the long history of OPSEC/sensitive material mishandling.
Again- burn everyone to the ground over this. I do not care. Strip their clearances, find another SECDEF, put people in jail. None of that will happen, so the question I’ll ask (like a million times in different threads) is this.
Why do you care about this now as if the sky is falling? Could it be you don’t like the people doing it and you were totally willing to extend all the grace in the world over this sort of thing until about 48 hours ago when this story broke?
Gotta talk to her about it bro, I didn't make the claim, I wasn't there, and I won't defend something that was said if those first two gates aren't met.
Since some of you may not know me, if anyone needs to me to establish my bonafides, LFG. I was the cybersecurity guy (ISSO) for AFCENT's C2 node for 5 years.
#WhiskeyLeaksDems on FOX just asked if Hegseth was drunk texting.
I haven't, but i also haven't gone looking.Anyone find the full readouts of the signal chat? As in, all the messages?
You don’t even need 2 phones anymore, @Marauder06 . I had a ‘work phone’ for most of my career, and even the 2 shop would tell you it’s as secure as the network you’re talking on.
All that talk about WICKR earlier- secure messaging approved by AFSOC, on your personal phone, on a network owned by China.
I want to make this super clear- in no way am I using the argument “This happens all the time”. That’s a dumb reductive argument. But I am also not looking at this situation as if it exists in a silo completely and totally separate from the long history of OPSEC/sensitive material mishandling.
Again- burn everyone to the ground over this. I do not care. Strip their clearances, find another SECDEF, put people in jail. None of that will happen, so the question I’ll ask (like a million times in different threads) is this.
Why do you care about this now as if the sky is falling? Could it be you don’t like the people doing it and you were totally willing to extend all the grace in the world over this sort of thing until about 48 hours ago when this story broke?
And here is a super fun story that I couldn't care less about. There are about 700 reasons to dislike Jasmine Crockett, possibly the dumbest elected official we have. This story is a nothing burger and does not matter. I don't get mad when Jasmine Crockett says dumb things in the same way as I don't get mad at dogs for barking. Dogs bark. Stupid people say stupid things.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/worl...ot-wheels-internet-fumes-101742915252091.html
Mannnnnn I didn’t even want to get into this.
Let’s say you’re deployed to Africa. Let’s say you’re doing FID and some other things, and the only way you contact your partner forces through WhatsApp. They don’t have or use anything else and they also don’t know what the crap OPSEC is. So you end up on about 200 WhatsApp chains on your personal phone (because the command in its infinite wisdom didn’t get burners for you), and a lot of the information on there is at least sensitive.
Oh I forgot to mention that for all your ‘encryption’ and double speak and tradecraft none of that matters because the entire architecture you’re talking on is Chinese owned and operated because they own the cell service in Africa.
Now pretend all the teams do that in every country in Africa in every command to this day. Every flight schedule every show time every team engagement.
And it all flows through a single point- China- and out into the world.
Anyway here’s wonderwall.
"TEAM UPDATE: TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package). 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)," Hegseth apparently wrote in a screenshot of a text message released Wednesday
"1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package). 1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets). 1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched," Hegseth reportedly continued, before adding "Godspeed to our Warriors."
"It didn't say WHAT F-18s in WHICH package- the ATO isn't for release so of course we didn't specify, that's bad OPSEC but not what the Dems are making it seem." That's the next iteration of this one.
Yeah, it was out there before I said it—I just caught up on X—but that's going to be the line.Your example is pretty much in line with the reality of reactions.