Box
Verified SOF
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,783
That’s a YUGE use of the word “IF”
If we had better political and military leaders we may not have found ourselves mired in someone else’s fight to begin with
More importantly - “IF” - we elected a more asymmetrical approach that kept us from spending 800 billion dollars a year, half of our crooked politicians would be ran out of office.
Not because “we the people” like meaningless endless wars - and choose to vote them out for not giving away all our money…
They’d be out of work because the defense contractors and industry executives that donate millions of dollars worth of campaign money would simply pay to install a more war friendly politician into the office because endless conflict (I believe the current pet name is ‘campaigning’) as a profitable foreign policy is awesome when you work for the non existent military industrial complex.
Besides, why push for peaceful solutions when the tax payer is too fucking stupid to realize that every single solitary talking head that comes on TV as a “special consultant” or “news contributor” or “former military commander” or “former intelligence expert” is only on TV to do three very specific things…
1) collect a paycheck for their TV appearance
2) sell the narrative for the company that they work for that is making millions from endless conflict as a profitable foreign policy
3) help legitimize continued involvement in other peoples problems thereby further legitimizing endless conflict as a profitable foreign policy
If we had better political and military leaders we may not have found ourselves mired in someone else’s fight to begin with
More importantly - “IF” - we elected a more asymmetrical approach that kept us from spending 800 billion dollars a year, half of our crooked politicians would be ran out of office.
Not because “we the people” like meaningless endless wars - and choose to vote them out for not giving away all our money…
They’d be out of work because the defense contractors and industry executives that donate millions of dollars worth of campaign money would simply pay to install a more war friendly politician into the office because endless conflict (I believe the current pet name is ‘campaigning’) as a profitable foreign policy is awesome when you work for the non existent military industrial complex.
Besides, why push for peaceful solutions when the tax payer is too fucking stupid to realize that every single solitary talking head that comes on TV as a “special consultant” or “news contributor” or “former military commander” or “former intelligence expert” is only on TV to do three very specific things…
1) collect a paycheck for their TV appearance
2) sell the narrative for the company that they work for that is making millions from endless conflict as a profitable foreign policy
3) help legitimize continued involvement in other peoples problems thereby further legitimizing endless conflict as a profitable foreign policy