That's... a lot.No wonder Putin is taking all comers for this war. They've already lost 40k bodies in combat power between KIA/WIA/MIA/POWs.
NATO: Up to 40,000 Russian Troops Killed, Wounded, Taken Prisoner or Missing in Ukraine
That's... a lot.No wonder Putin is taking all comers for this war. They've already lost 40k bodies in combat power between KIA/WIA/MIA/POWs.
NATO: Up to 40,000 Russian Troops Killed, Wounded, Taken Prisoner or Missing in Ukraine
One month.No wonder Putin is taking all comers for this war. They've already lost 40k bodies in combat power between KIA/WIA/MIA/POWs.
NATO: Up to 40,000 Russian Troops Killed, Wounded, Taken Prisoner or Missing in Ukraine
Guess nobody is.Who is talking with Russia?
Macron has mediated about 10 calls. Bennett tried to do some stuff, but comes off as a Russian stooge. Then Erdogan hosted two rounds of talks in Turkey.One month.
What is Putin's off ramp at this point? This should be a huge concern and priority for everyone. I'm not seeing anything about any sr. level discussions with Russia, certainly not anything from the Biden administration. Who is talking with Russia?
Is the U.S. even in the room?Macron has mediated about 10 calls. Bennett tried to do some stuff, but comes off as a Russian stooge. Then Erdogan hosted two rounds of talks in Turkey.
It Russia isn't taking their calls, then the Biden administration needs to find someone they will speak with...and not Kamala.
Is the U.S. even in the room?
From a foreign policy perspective, seems kind of important but maybe that's just me.
Is the U.S. even in the room?
From a foreign policy perspective, seems kind of important but maybe that's just me.
Eh, Biden picked up the red phone and no one picked up.Forgive the site, but this article is closet to the paywalled Washington Post one I wanted to share.
Biden lets European leaders take center stage against Russia
The main idea is that the US has been talking with allies but not taking center stage so as to avoid this being a "US vs. Russia" but "EU vs. Russia" conflict.
If it gets other countries into NATO/increases the actual defense spending of EU countries (Germany) then I'd call it a good strategy so far.
It’s astonishing to me that at this point I’m the war Ukraine’s Air Force consists of more than zero airframes.This is a story I want to hear more about:
One of the big questions has been "where's Russia's air force?"
Report's say Ukrainians are flying 5 - 10 sorties per day, there are/were regular dogfights and they're vastly outnumbered (like 5 to 1). They don't have a lot of jets left (~55), but have solid tactics and continue to punch above their weight.
I would have thought a flurry of GLCMs and AGMs would have thoroughly crushed them a week into the fighting. If not the airframes, the airfields and support facilities.It’s astonishing to me that at this point I’m the war Ukraine’s Air Force consists of more than zero airframes.
It’s astonishing to me that at this point I’m the war Ukraine’s Air Force consists of more than zero airframes.
I agree. I also wonder how much of it is attributable to A) the extraordinary about of foreign assistance the Ukrainians are getting; the kind of stuff that doesn't make the news and/or B) maybe the Russians are a whole lot serious about this whole thing than we thinkYeah, if we were doing this, there wouldn't be a single Ukrainian plane flying after day 1 or 2. I also cannot believe the Russians didn't destroy the Ukrainian power and telecommunications grid.
From what I understand, and I may be misinformed, a single EA-18G can degrade the telecommunications capability of like the entire east coast of the United States, and wipe out the GPS navigation capabilities in a similarly sized region. This happens occasionally during training, and NOTAMs are sent out for basically the entire east coast. Does Russia not have this capability, or is just choosing not to use it? It seems like what I was taught about the electronic capabilities of the Russians was vastly overestimated.