I gotta be honest, I don't support or agree with abortions, but, I also don't believe any government should have a say in what women do with their bodies, let alone any human being.
It's medical tyranny. What's the answer?
Especially with Thomas' concurrence basically begging for cases to overturn Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell (or contraceptions, same sex relationships, and same sex marriage), because they were all decided in a similar way to Roe.There will be blood.
Thomas, in his concurrence. He implies that all of those cases were also bad law like Roe and should be "corrected".What judge is saying he/she wants to reinstate sodomy laws and ban contraceptives?
for some reason didn't mention Loving (interracial marriage) even though that was also decided under the same parameters; I'm sure it's just an oversight and not at all his Religious views influencing him.
I think you misunderstood what I was getting at; I'm saying that his targeting of contraception, sodomy laws, and same sex marriage is likely based in religious views and not his stated opinion on due process.He's in an interracial marriage, so I doubt it has much to do with religion.
I hope you'll allow me to rephrase your comment to make sure I understand.I think you misunderstood what I was getting at; I'm saying that his targeting of contraception, sodomy laws, and same sex marriage is likely based in religious views and not his stated opinion on due process.
Edit: I apologize at the top, this is a much longer post than I intended it to be.I hope you'll allow me to rephrase your comment to make sure I understand.
"Contrary to Justice Thomas's stated opinion, I am saying that his ruling is likely based in his religious views, and not on his judicial opinion of due process."
If that is a correct re-statement of your point, could you flesh it out for me? How did you come to that opinion? Are there other examples you can present of Justice Thomas "likely" passing rulings "based in his religious views"?
I am probably ignorant on this one- I look forward to your illumination.
Apparently, pro-abortionists stormed Wisconsin's state capitol. Feds/state is hush on it. Guess, "insurrection" only happens if folks are wearing stupid, horned hats and not pink, vagina hats. Lol